The concept of participation requires a careful and thorough revision.
In the different ideals of representative democracy, political participation is
declined as an institutionalised practice, considered as compulsory for the
exercise of representation and necessary for increasing the civil attention to
the common good; in the experiences of direct democracy (or rather in the
various and sometimes trivializing theories of it) participation overlaps with
the idea of personal involvement and it is exercised (usually) through the
rejection of delegation. It is no coincidence that representation and
participation were very often placed in an antithetical and mutually exclusive
position. In the concrete practices of democracy, however, things are certainly
more complex, to the point that the concept of participation itself has
variously intertwined with that of representation, has been variously declined
and even its operationalization appears at least problematic.
The topic of
conflict – traditional in the social sciences but at the same time declined in
various dimensions – inevitably intertwines with the concept of participation
and the practices of civic engagement. Alongside the forms of participation
“by invitation” – typical, for example,
of many experiments of democratic innovation or of some practices, more or less
depoliticised, of collaborative governance – new trends of participation “by
irruption” have developed, where social actors have become protagonists in the
institutional re-shaping of procedures and organisation of social spaces.
These
two different directions of participation have variously intertwined both with
the “institutionalized” political practices (political parties, trade unions,
etc.) and with those of active citizenship and, finally, with the action of
social movements in the urban contexts. This scenario is made even more complex
by the growing centrality of digital ecosystems, which have become both a place
of representation and a space of conflict. This call intends to give space to
innovative studies - first of all empirical but without excluding those with a
theoretical critical cut - on the complex relationship between political
participation, democracy and the several forms of social conflict also (but not
exclusively) in the light of the transformations of the public sphere,
symbolically identified with the growing social centrality of digital
ecosystems.
Types of abstracts and deadlines
The extended abstract, in Italian or English (from 800 to 1000 words,
references included), has to be send by February 28, 2020 as e-mail attachment
to: rivistacussoc@unisa.it
The extended abstract has to be submitted with full title and five
keywords, furthermore it has to include name of author(s), affiliation(s), and
e-mail for correspondence. In case of more than one author, the corresponding
author needs to be indicated. The extended abstract should clearly illustrate
the topic, theoretical framework, research proceedings and scientific
relevance. Communication from the Editors concerning selection of abstracts
invited to develop into full papers (35,000 to 60,000 characters, including
footnotes, references and spaces) by March 15, 2020. The complete articles has be presented by May
30, 2020 through the journal OJS electronic platform and they must comply with
the guidelines, in addition the articles that will be presented in Italian must
also include the English title.
Communication concerning the peer-review process by September 15, 2020.
Revised and language edited full papers: October 15, 2020.
Final decision on revised papers: November 15, 2020
Publication: December 2020.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario