Patterns of cultural participation have been the focus of policy
research for decades. Particularly since the millennium, quantitative data,
often collected by governments, has established the notion of
‘non-participation’ as a ‘problem’ that the state needs to address (Balling and
Kann-Christensen, 2013; Jancovich 2015 Stevenson, 2013, Stevenson et al.,
2015). Yet despite decades of policies and projects to address this and a
growing body of research, carried out by consultants and academics, celebrating
the success of such interventions in addressing social inclusion and increasing
personal wellbeing, the same ‘problem’ appears to remain in regard to the
diversity of people who engage with state supported cultural organisations and
activities (Warwick Commission, 2015). It has even been claimed that Europe is
becoming it is becoming a “less cultural continent” (European Commission,
2013).
The way in which many projects, organisation and artists are funded and
evaluated, combined with the state of financial precarity in which a large
number permanently function, means that stories of failure about how cultural
participation policies and projects have been enacted are largely overlooked
and even supressed in the dominant discourses of cultural policy. This limits
and reduces the capacity for “social learning” (May 1992) which may better
facilitate change. Without an honest acknowledgement and critically reflective
exploration into the nature and extent of failure present in the existing
projects and policies by which cultural participation is supposedly supported,
then the legitimacy of the status quo will remain difficult to challenge.
This special edition of Conjunctions invites contributions that explore
the role and place of failure in regard to cultural participation. We invite
empirical, theoretical and practice informed contributions from across a range
of disciplines. Topics may include, but need not be confined to, the following:
- The value and role of recognising, understanding and learning from failure for cultural policymaking OR for cultural objects, artefacts and activities
- Defining and recognising failure in cultural participation projects/policies
- Cases studies of failure in cultural participation projects/policies
- The politics of failure in cultural participation projects/policies
- The morality and ethics of failure in regard to cultural participation projects/policies
- Evaluating and reporting on failure
- The relationship between quality and failure in delivering cultural projects
- Framing failure in evaluations
- Discourses of failure and success in cultural policy/cultural practice
Articles should be between 6000-8000 words, including endnotes, captions
and headings. All articles will undergo blind peer review for final selection
in the special edition.
Any questions related to this special edition can be sent to the guest
editors:
Dr Leila Jancovich: l.jancovich@leeds.ac.uk
Dr David Stevenson: dstevenson@qmu.ac.uk
Deadline for submissions: March 15, 2020
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario