Mistakes
and miscommunications occupy a special place in media theory, and for the field
of media archaeology in particular, posing a range of important questions. What happens to discourse when media machines do not operate in the way they
were intended? What happens when communication systems break down and start to
deliver misleading information? What are the conditions for the error in
21st century media? And what can attention to the possibilities for the
experience of miscommunications tell us about 21st century media and
culture in general?
These
questions pose a problem for media archaeology and identify a need for this
field to be expanded beyond its own paradigm to uncover the ways in which
errors and miscommunications address historical and contemporary cultural
techniques. This book invites contributions that investigate new methods,
topics and themes around the idea of miscommunication at the interface of media
archaeology and fields of cultural studies, art history, philosophy, film
studies, sound studies, and conflict studies, where an investigation of errors,
mistakes and falsity can provide new ways to understand creative and
epistemological processes. We argue that the potential for mistakes in any
communication system creates a specific agency – an ‘energy of delusion’ in the
worlds of Viktor Shklovsky, or as Umberto Eco describes it a ‘force of falsity’
– that awaits its reconsideration in the 21st century.
This book
aims to provide an opportunity to rethink media and communication theory – as
well as philosophies of mediation – by asking, what happens when communication
systems break down? What are the new political economies of noise? What happens
when political communication becomes non-dialectical? How can we rethink
digital media theory by looking at mistakes in programs? Break-downs, mistakes,
hacks, and quick fixes, might allow us to reconsider questions relating to
media determinism – these phenomena open up lines of flight and show us the
potential for users to find a way to live with programs. They give us a way to
rethink pessimistic versions of post-history by showing the points at which
systems can be changed. An exploration of miscommunication also offers a new
way to think about the conditions of contemporary political communication and
the exploitation of information systems.
We are
currently inviting authors to submit chapter proposals related to these broad
aims and at least one of the themes below:
- Media Archaeology of Mistakes/Miscommunication
- Non-dialectic media: Rethink contemporary media beyond the dialectical model of communication
- Errant research methodologies in media studies
- Noise and media: (a) Exploring the aesthetics of noise; (b) thinking about noise as productive
- Errors and glitches: in video games; art; music/sound art
- Post-truth communication
- Rethinking the post-digital
- Miscommunication and mistakes on social media
- Media philosophical description of errant communication
- Aesthetics of imperfection
- Gender as miscommunication
- Digital death as mistake in continuity of communication
- Textuality, technology and miscommunication
- Intentional miscommunications: frauds, forgeries, fakes
- Crisis/disaster/war miscommunications
- Waste and leakage
- Misinterpretation
- Creativity as miscommunication
- Madness, lunacy, and miscommunication
Abstracts
of 300 words (excluding references) are invited for chapters of between
6,000-8,000 words. Along with your abstract, please include a brief
biographical note of around 100 words. Abstract should be submitted to
m.korlokova@gre.ac.uk and timothy.barker@glasgow.ac.uk by 1st October 2018.
Important
dates:
1 October
2018: Submission of abstracts
15 October
2018: Notification of abstract acceptance
1 March
2019: Full chapter submission due
15 March –
1 June 2019: Chapters sent out for review and authors asked to revise texts, if
required.
1 August
2019: Final chapters ready for publication
Editors:
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario