The journal Humanities is now accepting submissions for publication in a special issue on
“(Re)Mapping Cosmopolitanism in Literature and Film.”
Cosmopolitanism
is not a set or coherent theory. Rather, there are multiple understandings of
what cosmopolitanism means and how it functions as a worldview or ideology.
These varied conceptions often share some characteristics while contradicting
others, but each is ultimately rooted in the meaning of the term in the
original ancient Greek: “citizen of the cosmos.” Basic to an understanding of
cosmopolitanism is the idea of transcending local allegiances by choosing to participate
in a broader and more universal culture. Rather than being defined by more
immediate cultures, traditions, and social groupings, one must perceive
connections further afield than the walls of the city or the borders of a
nation. The conceptual presence of “citizen of the cosmos” has been in
operation in the West since the 4th century B.C., and from that time it has
continually found its way into the political, social, cultural, philosophical
and artistic discourse of first western and then world tradition(s) and
culture(s). While perhaps most obviously conjoined with the project of empire,
cosmopolitanism is also tied to the effects of travel and migration, of a
mobile citizenship that can be both desirable and forced.
In
particular, since the late 19th century, cosmopolitanism has been a crucial
element of modernity connected to various attempts at internationalism, not
only in politics but also importantly in modernist art—literature, dance,
painting, film, etc.—which deliberately reached beyond national boundaries.
Modernist and avant-garde writers were often ex-pats and world travelers who
intentionally developed a cosmopolitan perspective in their aesthetics and
narratives. The early twentieth century also saw the important development of
cinema, which gave cosmopolitanism a new edge: movies disseminated concepts and
fashions to different parts of the world, building a global discourse and
iconography while maintaining local variations. After WWII cosmopolitanism
continued as a conceptual paradigm, exemplified by the destabilizing of
national identities with various attempts to create transnational networks and
connections that reflected a desire for both a broader European identity and
more comprehensive international alliances.
While
cosmopolitanism has at times been critiqued for spreading particular (western)
hegemonies, as the century progressed, it was complicated by the new and more
inclusive views of postmodern writers and filmmakers. Cosmopolitanism has thus
been increasingly re-conceptualized in recent decades, such as with the new
cosmopolitanism, which is heavily informed by post-colonial theory. This
process of analysis and reassessment has led to an expansion of understanding
and a rich new tradition of critical approaches exemplified by theorists like
Kwame Anthony Appiah, Pheng Cheah, Ulrich Beck, Bruce Robbins, and Rebecca
Walkowitz. Such work has proven to be timely: in the past two years
cosmopolitanism has resurged as a crucial concept ripe for further examination.
The neo-nationalist assertions arising out of Brexit and the Trump presidency
have called into question the values inherent in a cosmopolitanism rooted in
humanist traditions. When Trump announced soon after his election that there
was “no certificate of global citizenship” but only “America first,” he brought
into focus a dichotomy between national and international world views that has
structured discourse about cosmopolitanism since the beginning.
The
challenge of cosmopolitanism does not reside only in political assertions,
however. It can be found in a variety of forms—narrative, aesthetic, and
cultural—that continue to shape and inform our experiences as citizens
navigating a complex world. This special issue aims to re(map) cosmopolitanism
by gathering scholarship that rethinks, reevaluates (and perhaps reinforces)
the value of cosmopolitanism as expressed in literature and film. Analyses of
individual works, multiple works by one or connected artists, and more
wide-ranging foci are all welcome. Essays that focus on work from the late 19th
century (after the advent of film) through the present are particularly
welcome.
The
deadline for submission of articles is December 30, 2018. Please email articles
directly to guest editors Jennifer Barker jbarker@bellarmine.edu and Christa
Zorn czorn@ius.edu. You may submit your manuscript at any point up until the
deadline. Submitted papers should not be under consideration for publication
elsewhere. We also encourage authors to send a short abstract or tentative
title to the Editorial Office in advance (humanities@mdpi.com).
For further
reading, please follow the link to the Special Issue Website.
For further
details on the submission process, please see the instructions for authors.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario