The
possibility that a civilization might not succumb to the advance of history
depends on its capacity to react to the challenges that emanate from it. If, on
one hand, ascent and decline are (in general) considered characteristics
typical of all civilizations, on the other hand it is possible to also see them
as a different and less evident phenomenon: one which is made up of the
transformation of civilizations into other civilizations and in their
expressions of social innovation phenomena.
Clearly, it
does not make sense to reason in terms of universal determinism, that is, with
the idea of a necessary cycle that always works similarly both in different
historical moments as well as in geographic and social contexts. Nor is it
correct to reduce the multiplicity of civilizing processes to a unique model of
“civilization”. The historical dynamics of civilization work differently and do
not act only from the outside upon individuals and social groups. On the
contrary, within these processes, individuals generate or internalize certain
values, which make them bearers – through their existence – in the increasingly
broader environment in which they live.
Today, more
than in the past, both individuals and their surrounding contexts are globally
connected. The interaction between different processes of civilization
continuously manifests itself, generating a possible twofold development: a
progressive clash between civilizations originating from the conflict between
the different identities that contend for hegemony over a world perceived as
global but also delineated by defined and irreducible spaces and identities; or
an idea of civilization that is decentralized and de-spatialized originating
from a dynamic of continuous hybridization, shaped by the intangible flows that
crisscross the globe.
The
multiplicity of ongoing processes and their temporal durations may push towards
a more plural redefinition of globalization understood as the set of ways in
which different cultures acknowledge (or have conceived) the interdependence
and contact between civilizations. Thinking about what were, or are, the
relationships between different civilizations and different “globalizations” as
well as how they change the processes of civilization in relation to plural
global dynamics, can undoubtedly offer new paradigms in which to understand
social complexity with hermeneutical modalities that are just as complex.
Glocalism,
a peer-reviewed, open-access and cross-disciplinary journal, is currently
accepting manuscripts for publication. We welcome studies in any field, with or
without comparative approach, that address both practical effects and
theoretical import.
All
articles should be sent to: p.bassetti@globusetlocus.org and
davide.cadeddu@unimi.it
Articles
can be in any language and length chosen by the author, while its abstract and
keywords have to be in English.
Deadline:
January 31, 2019. This issue is scheduled to appear at end-March 2019.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario