The Journal of e-Media Studies invites papers concerning the motion
picture activities of the United States Information Agency (USIA). In response
to the increased availability of USIA materials in multiple archives in the
United States and the emergence of pertinent international scholarship, this
call for papers invites new work that broadly addresses the relevance of the
USIA archives to the field of film and media studies.
During the second half of the twentieth century, the USIA and the
constituent global branches of the United States Information Service (USIS)
factored diplomatically across the Cold War world through the production,
distribution, and sponsorship of films and the export of audiovisual and
televisual media infrastructure and expertise. The archive roughly holds 18,000
films made throughout the world and distributed to over 150 nations in nearly
fifty languages. They represent a variety of subject matters and filmmaking
styles, including narrative documentary; newsreel (weekly magazines, cultural
topics, diplomatic visits); puppet animation and cartoons; “how-to”
agricultural, modernization, and military films; and fiction (moderating the
distribution of Hollywood titles).
Although operating as a top-down agency of global campaigns of
persuasion and diplomacy, the USIS branches often developed relative to the
sociopolitical contingencies of their local context. Moreover, the USIA was
active in the United States by supporting small production companies and
emerging filmmakers, often privileging the work of graduate students,
minorities, and young people.The USIA also contracted and collaborated with
university-affiliated entities, programs of technical assistance (such as Point
Four, later USAID), the military, the State Department, and other government
agencies. Many cases of the resulting cross-cultural partnerships, affective
relations, and gift economies testify to the porous nature of the USIA
apparatus amenable to individual agency and empowerment. As these governing
rationalities demonstrate, the USIA participated in a complex ecology of
operations through negotiations of binational contracts, multi-level
bureaucracy, and shifting power relations.
Because USIA materials were intended for non-Americans outside the
United States and placed under a domestic U.S. distribution ban until 2012, the
USIA represents for American scholars a large and relatively unknown film and
media “studio”. In conjunction with the film collections now becoming available
at multiple archives (chief among them the National Archive and Records
Administration), the USIA paper trail available in archives represents an
additional resource of great value for investigating the global flow and
bureaucratic rationality of USIA/S film and media infrastructure after World
War II. More than any other existing archive, the USIA/S collections present
opportunities for researching once classified cultures of filmmaking and media
governance. Accordingly, USIA research may foster methodologies that seek to
understand and make legible media circulation across institutional, linguistic,
cultural, and economic borders.
Given the massive size, variety, and dispersiveness of the USIA/S
materials, the archive also warrants creative engagement from the digital
humanities. Questions of access, organization, and annotation prove
particularly salient when considering the USIA motion picture at scale. We
intend for this special issue will help to advocate for new collective efforts
to aid in the recovery, discovery, collation, and analysis of USIA/S materials
and promote further opportunities for inquiry among scholars who previously did
not have access to the archives.
We suggest the following list of topics and welcome other approaches:
- The infrastructure for establishing television and film labs in postcolonial nations
- The influence of USIA initiatives and its satellite (contracted) institutions in the formation of national cinemas in postcolonial nations
- The sponsorship and development of mobile screening and rural television production
- The promotion of audiovisual literacy and screen culture among postcolonial nations
- Narratives and theories of labor in USIA/S media production
- The development of workshops for documentary filmmaking and newsreel production
- Media governance, nation-building, and USIS operations
- Production, distribution, and exhibition histories of USIA/S moving image divisions
- Genre, form, and aesthetics of the USIA/S film output
- Film-viewing cultures within USIS sites of operation
- Embassies and USIS offices as sites of policy and diplomatic governing through film
- Protocols and practices in USIS film libraries and archives in relation to the formation of national film archives
- U.S. and other national censorship boards related to the USIA/S operations
- Legal histories of the “Smith-Mundt Act” and policies related to USIA motion pictures
- Intersections of USIA operations and American cinema more broadly (policy, regulation, sponsorship)
- The politics of race, gender, and class relations (representational practices)
- The relation of USIA/S missions to the development of film studies in the U.S.
- USIA archives and contemporary tools of the digital humanities (e.g., access, annotation, analysis at scale)
- USIA role in histories of data gathering: surveys, polling, and interviews of film audiences
The Journal of e-Media Studies is an online, peer-reviewed publication.
It is an open access journal that prioritizes utilizing the affordances of
digital publishing (such as the inclusion of clips within published pieces) and
is committed to the free circulation and use of its content. A variety of
submission types will be accepted. These include double-blind peer reviewed
essays; works in progress that seek feedback (working papers); reviews of books
and conferences; and works that reflect upon previously published case study
manuscripts.
Please send abstract submissions (up to 300 words plus 3-5 bibliographic
sources) to e-media.journal@dartmouth.edu between June 16th and July 14th,
2019.
Completed manuscripts (8000-12000 words) for accepted proposals will be
due by September 30, to initiate the double-blind review process.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario