We are seeking essays dealing with medial adaptations of the work of
H.P. Lovecraft. Amidst the recent Lovecraft renaissance, the adaptation of
Lovecraft’s stories, but also of “Lovecraftian” themes and motifs, into various
kinds of audiovisual narratives has proliferated and become vastly successful
in a number of guises. Critical discussions of this phenomenon, however, have
often been restricted to the identification of Lovecraft’s themes, adaptation’s
fidelity to Lovecraft’s texts, and the influence of Lovecraft on contemporary
horror and weird fiction more generally. The proposed collection will expand
the discussion of Lovecraft adaptation by interrelating strongly on the
concrete formal and medial choices of adaptations with the specific demands (if
there are any) of Lovecraft(ian) fiction. Departing from a theoretical
discussion that has seen Lovecraft as either congenial to adaptation or
entirely resistant to it, it aims to understand Lovecraftian adaptation as a
means of negotiating different ways of representing the unrepresentable, and to
question the notion of the unrepresentable itself. Lovecraftian adaptation goes
beyond its own relation to Lovecraft’s fiction, and helps us understand the
respective affordances of written fiction versus audio visual media, permitting
us not just to see the peculiarities of Lovecraft better, but also to ask
fundamental media-theoretical questions.
We are looking for essays that address the question of Lovecraft
adaptation in visual, aural, and mixed media: professional and amateur films,
TV series, podcasts, (video) games, comics, and other media. Media of interest
may be “direct” adaptations of Lovecraft’s source material or those called
“Lovecraftian,” and we encourage discussion of this latter term especially with
regards to the question of what, if anything, gets “adapted” in so encompassing
a term. Among the texts we are interested in are, for instance, the films
produced by the H.P. Lovecraft Historical Society, the German Die Farbe, or The
Color Out of Space (2020), but also older adaptations; radio plays and podcasts
such as British Radio 4’s The Whisperer in Darkness (2019-2020), but also
things like Tanis (2015-) or The White Vault (2017-); video games such as the
Dead Space Series (2008-2013), Alan Wake (2010), Bloodborne (2015), At the
Mountains of Madness (2016, still in early access), The Call of Cthulhu (2018),
or Moons of Madness (2019), as well as older games such as Alone in the Dark
(1992); the large number of Lovecraft and Lovecraftian comics, such as Alan
Moore’s Providence series or Joe Hill and Gabriel Rodriguez’s Locke & Key
(2008-2013). All of these are very much inter alia; we are looking for a wide
variety of source texts.
Among the topics we are interested in are media-philosophical
discussions of the problem of Lovecraft(ian) adaptation; interpretative
readings of Lovecraft(ian) fiction; the affordances of medial forms (including
their capacity to be both expansive and limited in their relationship to Lovecraft);
the relationship between Lovecraft’s medial afterlives and the market; the
question of Lovecraft and contemporary philosophy as reflected in the media
texts; what Lovecraft adaptation can tell us about adaptation more generally;
what is named by “Lovecraftian” in these texts; and a variety of other topics
that address the complex of questions sketched above, ideally interrelating
several of these issues. Especially when you aim to propose a “Lovecraftian”
text, we would appreciate a rationale for this determination.
We are looking for 300-500 word abstracts and a short biography, to be
submitted by August 31, 2020, to lanzendo@uni-mainz.de and
maxdreys@uni-mainz.de. We will collect the most promising abstracts into a
coherent volume addressing the problems laid out above, and will propose the
collection to Palgrave Macmillan’s series Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and
Visual Culture, who have already expressed an interest in the project. Finished
essays of about 7000 words are expected around June 2021; details to be cleared
later. Please forward this CfP to interested parties.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario