Since the start of 2019, the world has witnessed startling
anti-government mass demonstrations. From Sudan, where a dictator ruled the
country for over three decades, to Hong Kong, where hundreds of thousands of
protestors are demanding democracy and an end to police brutality. The mass
movements, which are largely youth-led and involve a wide array of people who
might have never been politically engaged before, are taking place in
unprecedented numbers in Algeria, Bolivia, Catalonia, Chile, Iraq, Lebanon and
more around the world. The protestors from across the globe, in spite of the
varied contexts, have common calls and framings: the demonstrations are
anti-institution, demanding socio-economic reforms with a clear lens of and for
equality and the end of corruption and neo-liberal policies.
This mass mobilization is not only unprecedented in size and spread, but
also in its ability to create spaces for expression that know no redlines or
limits. From artistic expression – almost depicting events in real-time – to
songs, dance and collective discussion where people from all backgrounds have a
say. While largely leaderless, anti-institution and horizontal in power
distribution, these mass movements have been organized and effective in making
significant changes on the level of the people, particularly in their ability
to reclaim space and shift narratives that have previously been limited by
institutional dominance and official discourse. The change is yet to reach the
level of the ruling elites, who devise education strategies, curricula and policies,
including citizenship education (CE).
Proliferated globally, CE is taught in the majority of countries yet it
does not speak to realities on the ground. The current institutionally led and
dominated practices of CE can be critiqued for being depoliticized and
nationalist, which often results in the marginalization and acculturation of
many groups – primarily refugees and migrants. These groups are absent from the
official narrative and are forced to adopt it though it ostracizes them from
the ‘imagined community’ portrayed in national citizenship curricula. Being
bound to the nation state, CE often adopts the ideology of the ruling party or
class, sees through a naive and uncritical lens regarding the examined subjects
and steers away from exploring and critiquing various ideologies.
With increasing mobilizations across the world, the state, equipped with
water cannons, tear gas, mass arrests and, in some cases, live ammunition, is
facing demonstrators. These acts of violence are punishment for practicing
citizenship duties, implying that the state condemns such forms of civic
participation.
This response raises several questions about CE, including whether the
state is really interested in its citizens’ engagement in political life. Are
there desired and less desirable forms of active citizenship, and how would
youth in countries where mobilization is occurring imagine and envision CE?
Against this background, this special issue of CTL has several aims:
- It will seek to position CE within this fast-changing and highly politicized environment where youth are increasingly playing a major role in current mobilizations, be they socially, politically, economically or environmentally instigated.
- It will seek to initiate a critical conversation between the different manifestations and facets of mass social movements led by youth, and CE.
- It will seek to re-envision the meanings and conceptualizations of CE, inspired by the radical changes happening globally in reclaimed and imagined spaces by young people, as well as the impact of CE on political engagement beyond the traditional confines of nation states and institutions.
- It will seek to understand how youth perceive, formulate and practice active citizenship, and what kind of education young people seek to realize through their mobilization.
- It will seek to understand how young people express notions of citizenship in different modalities of expression, such as art, theatre, music, dance, reclaiming of public spaces, social media, etc.
- It will seek to highlight the perspectives of groups that suffer legal, social, political, economic and cultural violence and marginalization through citizenship education.
We call for contributions based on these six aims, which go beyond the
limiting institutional definition and practice of CE within classrooms and
schools only, for example, or through institutionally devised curricula that
depoliticize and decontextualize CE. We also encourage articles that adopt an
intersectional lens when researching youth mobilization. This call is for
researchers, educators, activists, artists and other community members who are
currently involved in social mobilization around the world.
We welcome two types of contribution in this special issue:
- Academic articles (8,000 words).
- Reflections and opinion pieces written by youth and activists (2,000 words).
Please direct all submissions to the two guest editors’ emails and not
through CTL’s standard online submissions system.
Abstract submission deadline: 15 June
Full article submission deadline: 15 October
Read more here.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario