“Geomedia 2021 – Off the Grid”
The 4th International Geomedia Conference
Wednesday, 05. - Saturday, 08 May 2021
Organized Locating Media | Media of Cooperation
The phrase “off the grid” is commonly understood to refer to the voluntary decoupling from established infrastructure networks such as electricity, water or gas supply. The implication is one of material independence and a self-sufficient lifestyle. Going “off the grid” means making yourself invisible by rebuking the social and technological structures that normally organize our lives. It is entering, or returning to, uncharted territory. The grid from which you disappear is often imagined like a web that we are woven into, at once providing security – of cultural connectivity, opportunities to work, or societal participation – while also limiting individual, political or technological agency.
The grid also speaks to the geographic coordinate
system, an all-encompassing global structure which makes it possible to
accurately locate any point on earth. This unified grid represents a dominant
ordering principle for everything “locatable”. It is part of the technological
infrastructure of many platforms, services and applications which fall under
the definition of geomedia, most prominently the Global Positioning System
(GPS). In this regard, “off the grid” is a move away from such Cartesian
notions of space towards a situated relational account of (quotidian) practices
carried out with, through, or in relation to, geomedia.
Going off the grid has also been seen as a form of
renunciation of the conveniences of the late capitalist (media) world in order
to lead a supposedly slower, less stressful and eventually less superficial
life – as inspired by the transcendentalism of the likes of Henry David Thoreau
and Ralph Waldo Emerson. But with so many people relying on the grid for
purposes of work and entertainment in recent times, what does this mean for our
relation to geomedia? What does going off the grid look like now? This
presupposes, of course, that there is ipso facto a grid – an infrastructure –
which one can connect to freely at any time. But a great number of people do
not get to choose to decouple from the grid – a fact that speaks to questions
of access to the socio-material infrastructures underpinning geomedia and
associated communities and practices.
Arguably, practices of surveillance and
countersurveillance concern the implicit or even involuntary participation in
corresponding infrastructures. Here, optimization for a range of tasks and
activities routinely involves a certain kind of surveillance; a default setting
in the running of all kinds of media platforms used for navigation, video
streaming or online gaming. In this, surveillance is wrapped up with
profit-seeking practices, and the extraction of value from the ‘data fumes’ of
platform users, who enter a form of “cooperation without consensus” as they
stream movies, hire taxis, host videoconferences, ride public transport, or go
on dates. In these various iterations, surveillance might look different,
and/or be practiced in distinct ways to traditional forms of state or corporate
surveillance, increasingly dependent on technological protocols and standards
that not only underpin the grid but also govern our use of geomedia. One
consequence is that the relation between private and public spheres is
transformed, and introduces new questions of governance, exploitation and
marginalization. It is of crucial importance, who is online, and who is offline
might as well not exist. Yet these optimization processes are also subject to
countermeasures that constitute new modes of existence - from anonymous
accounts and the use of VPNs, to location spoofing, and other tricks and
techniques to hide, erase, or obfuscate user activity and location.
Yet the grid is not all-encompassing, nor
all-powerful. Whilst countersurveillance efforts resist, fight back and oppose,
alternative geomedia projects imagine the grid differently – sometimes even
plotting its demise. From community broadband initiatives, to independent media
organizations, post-capitalist streaming platforms, and citizen science
projects; there is a continued, concerted effort to build alternatives to
state-based, or company-owned geomedia, operating at various scales from the
hyperlocal to the global. Through these efforts, organizers and participants
question the foundations of our collective social and technological
infrastructures, redefining what it is to care, share, distribute, cultivate or
reallocate funds, resources, opportunities and ideas – bringing new geomedia,
and new imaginaries of hope (or perhaps fear), into existence.
Suggested paper topics include, but are not limited to:
- Politics, philosophy and ethics of going off grid
- Grid as Network, Grid as Default (Geomedia and Infrastructure)
- Physical Geography/Relational Geography
- Inhabiting Digital Geographies (VR, hybrid spaces)
- Geomedia in the Global South
- Urban and Rural Geomedia
- The ‘geo’ in Geomedia, the ‘media’ in Geomedia
- Governing Geomedia (smart city, sensor media, infrastructures, surveillance & countersurveillance)
- Geomedia Activism
- Digital detox, rationing, quarantine and isolation
- Geomedia Histories
Geomedia 2021 welcomes proposals for individual papers as well as thematic panels in English.
Individual paper proposals: The author submits an abstract of 200–250 words. Accepted papers are grouped by the organizers into sessions of 5 papers according to thematic area.
Thematic panel proposals: The chair of the panel submits a proposal consisting of 4–5 individual paper abstracts (200-250 words) along with a general panel presentation of 200–250 words.
Conference timeline:
October 31st 2020: Submission system opens
January 7th 2021: Deadline for thematic panel and individual paper proposals
January 25th 2021: Notes of acceptance and registration opens
March 15th 2021: Last day of registration
For further information; pls. contact:
info@geomediastudies.com and see.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario