“Forms, History, Narrations, Big data: Morphology and Historical Sequence”,
International Conference
November 21-22, 2019 – Torino (Italy)
Historical explanation, explanation seen as a linear hypothesis, is just
one way of gathering data – their schema. One can equally well consider data in
their reciprocal relation and summarize them in a general image regardless of
the form of a chronological development. Wittgenstein’s remarks on Sir James
Frazer’s The Golden Bough, echoes similar stances coming from different fields
of enquiry, such as Propp’s Morphology of the Folktale (1928) and André Jolles’
Einfache Formen (1930). They open up an on-going critical debate about how to
study historical phenomena.
What kind of relationship is established between historical or
contextual enquiry and morphological analysis when we interpret a literary text
or a work of art? Are we dealing with conflicting, even incompatible, modes of
understanding or with interrelated and complementary ways that enlighten each
other? Do literature and the arts symbolically convey a particular historical
time, or are they to be seen as “precarious patterns of connections” which,
though anchored to a given spatial and temporal dimension, bring together
motives, topoi, and themes stemming from cultures and times far-apart?
Following Carlo Ginzburg’s new introduction (2017) to Storia Notturna
(1989; 2017), and by setting out to reconsider the ever-recurring argument
opposing a contextual-historical to a morphological-formal approach in terms of
mutual integration, we may find that one is constantly enmeshed with the other.
Thus, both are necessary to critical enquiry: “though achronological, according
to Propp, morphology may have laid the foundations of diachronical
investigation” (Ginzburg 2017: xxxi).
While searching for “correspondences” regardless of historical contexts,
the morphological approach brings to light clues, signs, and hints that can be
of use in historical research. According to Wittgenstein, the übersichtliche
Darstellung, or bird’s eye view representation, helps the kind of comprehension
that consists of “seeing connections” and needs finding intermediate links. As
a consequence, a morphological approach to literature and the arts will focus
on the way change and continuity alternate and dialectically act on one
another. It addresses the historical issue of longue durée of topoi, themes,
motifs.
Exploring continuity implies investigating cultural memory and literary
anthropology; it relates to recent perspectives highlighting the cognitive
grounds of literary, and non-literary, narratives; in this way it also relates
to a generalised “narrative turn”, where
the understanding of narrative is based on cognitive sciences and a “natural
narratology” (Fludernik 1996). Furthermore, a morphological approach based on
“pattern of connection”, will be a prerequisite for any investigation of
literary phenomena based on big-data collections and distant reading (Moretti
2013), whether their ancestors be Spitzer’s Stilkritik or Propp’s narrative
functions, albeit in a new key. Although fictional narrative differs
essentially from historical writing, in both cases narrative provides us with
fundamental epistemological structures that help us to make sense of events,
experience and thoughts.
The Centro Studi Arti della Modernità is organizing an International Conference
on Forms, History, Narrations, Big Data: Morphology and Historical Sequence to
be held in Turin in November 21-22, 2019. The conference will address issues in
the field of historiography, literary criticism and the wider area of
interpretative practices of artistic and literary works organizing a dialogue
among various disciplines and perspectives.
The aim is to resume the critical and philosophical debate on the issue
of form and its modern variations or developments, first articulated in the
works of Georg Simmel, André Jolles, Aby Warburg, Roland Barthes, Paul Ricoeur,
and others. This debate revolved on the dialectics of sequence and
simultaneity, diachronic succession and system, in order to gain a richer
understanding of the notions of transformation and structure (central to
structuralism, post-structuralism) as well as literary and artistic
interpretation (central to hermeneutics).
- Aspects of the critical debate discussing diachronic and systemic dimensions in the study of literature and the visual arts.
- Historical contexts that gave birth and favoured, or hindered, the development of recurring morphological patterns (themes, motifs, topoi) both in literature and the visual arts.
- The way in which recurring patterns may show anomalies, variants, or alterations signalling a change of paradigm or historical transformations.
- The way in which morphological methods applied to historical analysis may disclose unforeseen “patterns of connections” among literary texts and works of art belonging to far-off places and ages.
- Can a morphological methodology applied to literature be compared with the same methodology when applied to other media, especially the visual arts?
- Can a method based on the analysis of clues and hints and on the search for morphological recurring elements, be applied to literary criticism?
- Are there any connections between morphological analysis and recent developments in narratology, as well as Moretti’s recent theorizing on distant reading and his using big data in literary enquiry?
Proposals of about 250 words may be submitted to convenors through
info@centroartidellamodernita.it, by 15 July 2019, together with a
bio-bibliographical profile. Proposals will be read and evaluated by 31 August
2019. The time of delivery for each paper should be no more than 20 minutes.
Registration fee for Participants: 50 euros; Graduate Students and PhDs: 40
euros. The conference languages will be English, French and Italian.
A number of conference presentations will be selected for publication in
Cosmo: Comparative Studies in Modernism (ISSN 2281-6658) the online international,
peer-reviewed journal of the Centro Arti della Modernità.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario