Mystery Science Theater 3000 represents the perfect intersection of Gen
X disaffection and cynicism, with the underlying affection and openness that
the stereotypes belie. Modern iterations of the popular deconstruction, like
podcast How Did This Get Made, attract audiences with varied perspectives. From
true aficionados of cult and less-popular films who crave a forum to discuss
the nuances of their favorites, to those seeking a takedown of a hated work,
the opportunities afforded by (meta)commentary programs for analysis of
otherwise dismissed films should be of interest to any media scholar.
Topics may include:
- Discussion of polysemic readings of unpopular films
- Discussion of the Kickstarter-funded renewal of MST3K
- Analysis of the industrial components of “bad” films
- Analysis of industrial components of modern commentary programs
Proposals may be brief, but do be sure to describe the topic and key
question(s) to be explored (as well as your name, affiliation, and Twitter
handle if applicable). Please submit your proposal by August 2, 2019. If
interested, please contact In Media Res (inmediares@gsu.edu) with topic
proposals or for more information about the theme. Be sure to include the name
of the theme week you would like to be involved with in the subject line of the
email.
Academics, journalists, critics, media professionals and fans are all
welcome to submit proposals.
The actual piece will include either a 30-second to 3-minute clip, an
image, or a slideshow that will be accompanied by a 300 to 350-word response
to/contextualization of your clip, image, or slideshow. In addition to your
piece, you will be expected to engage the other pieces presented that week to
encourage discussion and further flesh out the individual topic in relation to
the week’s theme. For more visit In Media Res.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario