The
academic journal Messages, Sages and Ages, based at
the English Department, University of Suceava, Romania, invites contributions
for an issue on archetypes and/or stereotypes. The theme issue is edited by Dan
Nicolae Popescu (University of Suceava, Romania).
According
to C.G. Jung, archetypes can be described as universal mythic characters that
reside in the collective unconscious of people(s) throughout the world. They
are recurring patterns (character types, plot structures, symbols, and themes)
that occur in mythology, religion, and stories across cultures, societies, and
time periods. As such, they personify universal meanings and basic human
experiences and can trigger unconscious responses in a reader. Archetypes can
also help people understand common traits they share with others outside their
own culture and to interpret situations and characters that might otherwise be
quite different from themselves. L. Nielsen, on the other hand, considers that
archetypes are made of personality traits built on ideals of basic human
patterns that appear as blends of stabled characteristics defining the
individual person. Thus, archetypes as theorized by Nielsen relate to three
main dimensions exemplifying psychological preferences of an individual:
extrovert-introvert, sensory-intuition, or thinking-feeling. These
characteristics and dimensions, it follows, possess the potential to
communicate relevant user data (individual and collective) in the configuration
process of socio-cultural construction.
Stereotypes,
by contrast, are but shortcomings that archetypal representations can easily
result into. Stereotypes are simplified clichéd ideas that express the way
humans categorize people who are or appear alike by providing social images as
synthesized reasons of why Others act as they do. Under the circumstances,
reinvented archetypal representations of culture and society run the risk of
re-inscribing existing stereotypes within the bounds of a user-centered
approach. Placing socio-cultural construction at a point of confluence between
archetypes and stereotypes, we experience a perpetually re-written/re-read text
that survives by successive re-contextualizations of its fundamental patterns.
Ultimately, these re-contextualizations pertain to a continuous process of
negotiation supported by the basic human need to assimilate otherness and
define ourselves with relation to it.
Possible
topics of interest include, but are not limited to:
- (The study of) Archetypal criticism
- From mythic archetype to media stereotype: symbol and story
- Cliché, trope, archetype, stereotype: the politics of (story)telling
- Language-based approaches to stereotype formation
- Revisiting archetypes on and off screen
- Cultural archetypes and national stereotyping
- Stereotypical slurs and archetypal sins
We welcome
original papers in English and invite proposals (no more than 9,000 words) from
senior as well as junior academics. The blinded manuscript, abstract (cca. 200
words) with 5 keywords, and brief curriculum vitae (cca. 300 words) should be
in Word and PDF format. Each electronic copy must be sent by email attachment
to: msa@usv.ro AND msa_usv@hotmail.com.
Submission
deadline: 1 September 2019
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario