In January 2018, Facebook declared that it would no longer prioritise
news content in its NewsFeed. Instead, it would surface posts from ‘friends and
family’, with the goal of bringing ‘people closer together’ (Mosseri, 2018).
Facebook had stopped promoting particular forms of news before (like clickbait
headlines) but they had always retained a broad commitment to distributing news
content. However, the change in 2018 represented a major pivot for a platform
that had increasingly become a central intermediary for online news
distribution. In response, digital-first publications, who had staked their
business model on Facebook’s ability to surface news to audiences, started to
lay off staff in significant numbers. These new disruptive news enterprises
(like Buzzfeed and Mic) were supposed to usher in a new future for news.
However, it appeared that their business models were as unstable as those of
their print predecessors.
These recent developments have not gone unnoticed by governments.
Policymakers and politicians across the world are starting to examine the role
that platforms and algorithms play in the distribution of news. Inquiries in
Australia, the United Kingdom, Canada and elsewhere have explored the
consequences of the algorithmic distribution of news. Alongside these national
inquiries, a broader international discussion has focused on the apparent rise
in disinformation and the increasingly partisan nature of political discourse.
This discussion has intensified recently, leading to the formation of an
International Grand Committee on Big Data, Privacy and Democracy composed of
elected officials from governments around the world.
This edited collection will respond to this international policy moment
and examine the challenges posed by the algorithmic distribution of news. It
will critically assess recent media policy developments in this space and
explore the broader economic, political and industrial transformations
associated with algorithmic distribution. In doing so, we aim to offer a
comprehensive account of this moment of institutional change, which has
significantly altered the distribution and consumption of news (see Nielsen
2018).
The book will be split into two sections. The first section will consist
of thematic chapters (5 - 6,000 words) and the second section will feature
shorter case studies (3 - 4,000 words) describing and analysing recent policy
developments related to algorithmic distribution in particular countries. We
are currently in discussions with interested publishers and seeking
contributions for both sections.
Possible topics include (but are not limited to):
- International governance of the algorithmic distribution of news, including the formation and operation of the International Grand Committee;
- Measures to support media diversity in light of algorithmic distribution, including measures to support local, Indigenous, alternative, independent, ethnic, women’s and minority news media;
- Case studies of countries (for section two): how have particular countries approached regulatory problems in light of the algorithmic distribution of news?
- Subsidies and tax exemptions that respond to the algorithmic distribution of news;
- Discussions of regulations intended to ensure the objectivity and/or transparency of search and recommendation algorithms;
- Regulatory measures that respond to layoffs and closures of news outlets;
- Intersections between copyright law and news aggregation (such as the EU’s Article 11, the ‘Google News tax;’
- The relationship between news, platforms, and competition law;
- Regulation of targeted advertising in relation to news;
- Histories of early forays into online (or social) news distribution;
- Analyses of innovative forms of news distribution;
- Civic risks associated with algorithmic distribution (or online engagement); and
- Detailed analyses of relevant inquiries or reform proposals.
If you are interested in contributing to either section, please send a
short chapter or case study proposal (of about 400 words) and a biography (150
words) by the 25th of October 2019 to james.meese@uts.edu.au and
banners@mcmaster.ca.
Editors: Sara Bannerman (McMaster University) and James Meese
(University of Technology Sydney)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario